|
|
Post by hc87 on May 17, 2016 11:53:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on May 17, 2016 12:55:36 GMT -5
Bad
Remember when these matters were private ?
|
|
|
|
Post by hc87 on May 17, 2016 13:35:23 GMT -5
Bad Remember when these matters were private ? Vaguely |
|
|
|
Post by lou on May 17, 2016 13:38:40 GMT -5
the issue, if there is one, won't be discussed on the Fordham board
|
|
|
|
Post by rgs318 on May 17, 2016 13:47:52 GMT -5
the issue, if there is one, won't be discussed on the Fordham board I am not sure it should have a place on CROSSPOSTS either. |
|
|
|
Post by A Clock Tower Purple on May 17, 2016 14:45:20 GMT -5
the issue, if there is one, won't be discussed on the Fordham board I am not sure it should have a place on CROSSPOSTS either. +1 Rob.
Not sure how this falls under "General Sports Discussion"
|
|
|
|
Post by Dean Wormer on May 17, 2016 15:16:18 GMT -5
I'm OK with it as long as this is about as far as it goes. And the same would apply to HC coaches.
However any references to it, especially with respect to job performance, would be walking a VERY thin line between appropriate and deletion, in my view, and I would tend to lean toward deletion. Think about Rick Pitino's "situation" a few years back. Certainly was worthy of discusson as we related it to CRW's departure. However, some of what was posted about Pitino at that time and since on the old board was over the line.
Also, will lock this thread from further posts so as to keep it from going over the edge and me constantly monitoring it.
And finally for reference, there is a clear source for the information and so Board Rule 7 comes to mind on why I think this is OK vs. deleting.
|
|
