|
Post by JRGNYR on Jul 18, 2016 9:02:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2016 9:17:07 GMT -5
2019--at Navy as well as the Cuse Nate is doing superbly
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 18, 2016 9:26:26 GMT -5
2019--at Navy as well as the Cuse Nate is doing superbly First game ever versus Navy----hard to believe we never have played the Midshipmen. Yes, Nate is doing a fantastic job.
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2016 9:39:48 GMT -5
One opponent that we still need is Army (I know I am never satisfied)
|
|
|
Post by lou on Jul 18, 2016 9:46:59 GMT -5
Nice photo of Yankee Stadium configured for football
|
|
|
Post by matunuck on Jul 18, 2016 10:20:08 GMT -5
Navy is simply outstanding. I go to several games a year there, and the atmosphere is great. As noted on our old board, Navy folks were very much hoping the PL would add schollies for football. Navy was always a top target for Pine.
|
|
|
Post by matunuck on Jul 18, 2016 10:25:45 GMT -5
Navy 2019 schedule, so far. Never thought I'd see this. Three cheers for the HC admin for ignoring the anti-schollie noise to save the program from oblivion.
09/07 - Holy Cross 10/05 - Air Force 11/16 - at Notre Dame 12/14 - Army (location, TBD)
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2016 10:31:07 GMT -5
See that in 2020 our opener is at bc the 2018 game is also the first Saturday in September hopefully our recruits will be as impressed with these schedules as we are
|
|
|
Post by A Clock Tower Purple on Jul 18, 2016 10:45:29 GMT -5
One opponent that we still need is Army (I know I am never satisfied) I'll take Navy over Army everyday. EXCELLENT work! Thank you ADNP!
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2016 10:57:49 GMT -5
One opponent that we still need is Army (I know I am never satisfied) I'll take Navy over Army everyday. EXCELLENT work! Thank you ADNP! Never spent a football Saturday in Annapolis, but West Point on a fall Saturday is hard to beat. And if trends continue, we have a better chance of beating Army. Why not play them both, either in the same season or alternate ones ?
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2016 11:03:34 GMT -5
A recent email says that we are playing Yale, five consecutive years, from '17-'21, alternating home fields with them getting three
|
|
|
Post by purplehaze on Jul 18, 2016 11:10:41 GMT -5
wow ! never thought i'd see these types of schedules - recruiting will be critical to be successful. a couple of observations: (it has been asked before but don't recall an good answer) why is the fordham game an HC home game in '16, followed by at fordham in '17? (and we played at fordham in '15) it should be a neutral site followed by 'at hc' in '17
we finish the regular season on the 2nd sat of november 2 consecutive years. (because the league has only 7 teams) this distinction has been rotated among all the schools in the past. this creates an open date before the 1st round of playoffs, which not be a bad thing.
|
|
|
Post by A Clock Tower Purple on Jul 18, 2016 11:12:50 GMT -5
I'll take Navy over Army everyday. EXCELLENT work! Thank you ADNP! Never spent a football Saturday in Annapolis, but West Point on a fall Saturday is hard to beat. And if trends continue, we have a better chance of beating Army. Why not play them both, either in the same season or alternate ones ? Let's walk before we run hoops and not look a gift horse in the mouth. Also Navy is a significantly better team than Army, a much more attractive match-up, and ambiance in Annapolis - one of the best towns in America, is terrific as well.
|
|
|
Post by hc87 on Jul 18, 2016 11:32:11 GMT -5
I was just talking yesterday to a cousin who lives in Annapolis and mentioned we had nevah played football there..... and voila!!! Great news, as others have mentioned, it seems hard to believe that this will be the first meeting on the gridiron between these two fine institutions. I really like the balance in general for the 2017-2021 schedules: peppered with FBS games with historical, regional ties (BC, Cuse, UConn, Navy), a good mix of New England Ivies (Brown, Dartmouth, Harvard and Yale) and a good balance of non-league FCS opponents (UNH, Central Conn, Monmouth).
We have a few years to fret about this, but what a tough (but challenging and I love it) staht to the 2019 campaign:
Aug. 31 at Syracuse Carrier Dome, Syracuse, N.Y. Sept. 7 at Navy Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, Annapolis, Md. Sept. 21 at Yale Yale Bowl, New Haven, Conn. Sept. 28 New Hampshire Fitton Field, Worcester, Mass. Oct. 5 at Bucknell * Christy Mathewson-Memorial Stadium, Lewisburg, Pa. Oct. 12 at Brown
|
|
|
Post by JRGNYR on Jul 18, 2016 12:18:38 GMT -5
wow ! never thought i'd see these types of schedules - recruiting will be critical to be successful. a couple of observations: (it has been asked before but don't recall an good answer) why is the fordham game an HC home game in '16, followed by at fordham in '17? (and we played at fordham in '15) it should be a neutral site followed by 'at hc' in '17 we finish the regular season on the 2nd sat of november 2 consecutive years. (because the league has only 7 teams) this distinction has been rotated among all the schools in the past. this creates an open date before the 1st round of playoffs, which not be a bad thing. I don't know the specifics of the conversations between all the parties involved but this is very similar to the Lafayette-Lehigh setup for the 150th meeting at Yankee Stadium. In essence, Lafayette "gave up" a home game to make it happen, much like HC is "giving up" a home game here. The home-away rotations for PL play were set years ago and it's very possible all the schools agreed among themselves that if such opportunities like this arose, the league would not have to redo the football (or any) schedule to accommodate special situations.
|
|
|
Post by Chu Chu on Jul 18, 2016 12:38:44 GMT -5
This scheduling is thrilling and says more about commitment than anything else could. Way to go ADNP and all!
Having said that, this will be a process of rebuilding that will take a while, and it is entirely possible that our team will be 0-4 to start 2019. As fans and alumni, we need to be realistic optimists! Go Cross!
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on Jul 18, 2016 12:40:39 GMT -5
A recent email says that we are playing Yale, five consecutive years, from '17-'21, alternating home fields with them getting three IIRC, HC and Yale have a nine or ten game contract extending into the next decade. Harvard series also extends into the next decade, and is also nine or ten games. The breakthrough with Harvard came when HC agreed not to always schedule it as Harvard's first game, and HC's third or fourth. The old board had links to the announcements, but again IIRC, these contracts happened in ADNP's first six months.
|
|
|
Post by CHC8485 on Jul 18, 2016 14:15:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sarasota on Jul 18, 2016 14:47:46 GMT -5
Kudos to ADNP and HCTG. The away games in general will be brutal......just sayin'
|
|
|
Post by rickii on Jul 18, 2016 15:26:31 GMT -5
I'll take Navy over Army everyday. EXCELLENT work! Thank you ADNP! Never spent a football Saturday in Annapolis, but West Point on a fall Saturday is hard to beat. And if trends continue, we have a better chance of beating Army. Why not play them both, either in the same season or alternate ones ? You'll love it hoops. Navy-Marine Corps Stadium is terrific. They use the salvaged boat horn from the USS Arizona liberally in-game ( it's atop one scoreboard ). Just prior to kick-off they loudly play 'Danger Zone' and show Tom Cruise launching off the carrier from 'Top Gun'....very cool stuff !!!Plenty of parking within a short walk ( no shuttle busses ) easy to get to, safe neighborhood so it's a true tailgate. And it's an easy walk post-game to the lovely Annapolis village for multiple choices of a seafood dinner on the warf.
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 18, 2016 15:40:39 GMT -5
I don't know what the bigger mystery is in the history of Holy Cross football (1) the fact we've never played Navy, as we have noted above or (2) our lifetime record against Yale of 4-27 with 1 win in the 14 games we've played since 1985. We'll certainly correct #1 and I pray we can make some progress on # 2
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on Jul 18, 2016 17:25:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hc87 on Jul 18, 2016 18:06:23 GMT -5
I don't know what the bigger mystery is in the history of Holy Cross football (1) the fact we've never played Navy, as we have noted above or (2) our lifetime record against Yale of 4-27 with 1 win in the 14 games we've played since 1985. We'll certainly correct #1 and I pray we can make some progress on # 2 As for #1, I remembah this was discussed a bit on the old board...I think one of the main reasons we nevah played Navy in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s anyway was that they were playing BC a lot then. The service academies like to spread their games around geographically and for whatevah reason, played our cousins in Newton for their "New England game." Not the only reason we didn't play Navy, but one of them. Glad this "not playing evah" is finally coming to an end. As for #2, this is an irritating legacy. The only school (in a series played 15 or so times) that approaches our futility against someone else is Syracuse (5-23). We were 0-9 against Penn St in the 50s and 60s. Part of our embarrassing record against the Eli can be rationalized away thusly: they dominated the series in the era of Waltahh Camp era (losing the 1st 11 games between these two fine institutions between 1903-1913), nevah playing Yale much during either Eddie Anderson era (1 game a 14-13 loss in 1950) and then only playing sporadically against some of our bettah 1960s and onward teams (HC beat Yale in 1967 the only meeting that decade) and then we didn't play them much in the Carter/Duffner era. (Brutal losses in '81 and '85). And we haven't played against them with a scholarship team since 1985. Doesn't completely wash away the Yale futility, but it does helps me sleep bettah.
|
|
|
Post by sarasota on Jul 18, 2016 18:44:53 GMT -5
I was at the last loss to Yale at Fitton. It was painful. We just could not stop their runs to their left.
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 18, 2016 18:58:59 GMT -5
Nice recap, hc87--helps us understand the confluence of factors that has contributed to the sub-optimal record versus Yale
|
|