|
|
Post by hchoops on Sept 21, 2017 20:33:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hc6774 on Sept 22, 2017 6:43:53 GMT -5
Given the accelerated time line, would it benefit PL programs?
|
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Sept 22, 2017 7:05:07 GMT -5
Little effect, probably
|
|
|
|
Post by bringbackcaro on Sept 22, 2017 8:01:43 GMT -5
Unless we get a good player, who is now free to transfer wherever he wants after his first year. Eliminating the 1-year waiting period could be really bad news for mid- and low-majors. While it is unfortunate if the coach who recruited you leaves or gets fired, you are still getting a free education and you should have picked that school for more reasons than just the coach. As much as people like Jay Bilas want to b*ch and moan, NCAA rules are never going to be perfect. But if there was a rule that really needed to go, it's the 1-and-done NBA rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Tom on Sept 22, 2017 8:30:14 GMT -5
If the purpose of the one year waiting period is to minimize targeting players attending other schools, this is a step backwards. The Caliparis of the world will be initiating back door conversations with every stud he can. I get the concept that kids might not fully understand what they're getting into at a college - it also happens with non-athletes all the time. However, the waiting period does help reduce the sleaze from the scummiest aspects of college recruiting
|
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Sept 22, 2017 8:51:07 GMT -5
Yes, I think the proposal, if implemented, could turn the "mid majors" (I hate the term) into a prep school for the "power" schools--"If I do well here at this mid-major I can get an offer from Big-Time State for my soph-junior-senior years"
|
|
