|
|
Post by Sons of Vaval on Sept 2, 2016 9:15:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by purplenurple on Sept 2, 2016 10:28:51 GMT -5
So all players were previously walk ons/non-scholarship players? If so, congrats to them for their dedication and the College for rewarding them.
|
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Sept 2, 2016 10:53:16 GMT -5
I love this type of story--very happy for the student-athletes
|
|
|
|
Post by rgs318 on Sept 2, 2016 11:16:50 GMT -5
Great to see after their hard work. Think their signatures will be any more clear from now on?  |
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on Sept 2, 2016 11:42:46 GMT -5
Outstanding!!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by sarasota on Sept 2, 2016 11:43:43 GMT -5
Are they all fifth-year players?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on Sept 2, 2016 12:44:08 GMT -5
Are they all fifth-year players? I believe several are. The scollie aid for such would be one semester-only. The FCS limit is 85 players receiving scollie aid, in full or in part. The PL had set a limit of 60 full scollie equivalents, but I believe this was upped to 63 full scollie equivalents, which is the FCS cap. The 63 and 85 caps encompass those receiving merit, or a combination of merit and need, or need-only. If a previous full scollie player is now not rostered this year, then that would free up half-year scollies for two players (fifth year seniors). Or if a full scollie recruit is not rostered, that would free up a scollie or two half scollies. |
|
|
|
Post by alum on Sept 2, 2016 12:50:05 GMT -5
Bad handwriting. That must have been why I never received an athletic scholarship. Who knew?
This is a great story. You have to be very happy for these kids (and for their parents, too!)
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Sept 2, 2016 13:02:32 GMT -5
Nicely done!
|
|
