|
Post by hchoops on Jul 17, 2020 7:21:11 GMT -5
“The Crusader doctor and the non-crusading judge” an article in today’s Globe Online behind paywall
|
|
|
Post by HC13 on Jul 17, 2020 8:15:12 GMT -5
The Crusader doctor and the non-crusading judge
By Kevin Cullen Globe Columnist, Updated July 16, 2020, 5:26 p.m.
My colleague Alex Beam likes to refer to Harvard as the World’s Greatest University, or WGU for short. It’s a subtle dig at the arrogance of some in the Cambridge chablis and brie set who can’t understand why everyone doesn’t think like them because everybody they know thinks like them. To be fair, Harvard has educated or employed some of the world’s greatest minds, none more important right now than Olga Jonas, who has forgotten more about pandemics than most others will ever know, and Ashish Jha, the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute.
But how about some props for the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester. Holy Cross may be best known for producing, in Bob Cousy, the best playmaking guard of his era. But the Cross also produced the nation’s most trusted doctor. Together, Harvard and Holy Cross have given us the two people who, at this moment, might hold the future of this republic in their hands: Dr. Anthony Fauci and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. While Fauci looks after the nation’s physical health, Roberts has done much to keep the nation’s body politic free from the disease of extremism.
Fauci, HC class of ‘62, has been a bulwark against some of the antiscience nonsense that the Trump administration has been peddling since the pandemic paralyzed the country. While President Trump has continually minimized the pandemic and its associated risks, Fauci has been straight with the American people, keeping his eye on the medical data, not the poll numbers that preoccupy Trump and his coatholders.
Fauci, a national treasure who proved his mettle during the AIDS crisis of the 1980s, has apparently survived a palace coup in which the White House openly undermined him, shopping opposition-research style talking points about him as if he were some insurgent progressive congressional candidate who sits around drinking lattes and plotting revolution with lefties like AOC and Ayanna Pressley.
While Trump and his handlers have politicized the pandemic and the science surrounding it, Fauci has kept the focus where it always should have been: limiting the spread of the virus. A Crusader in college, Fauci has been a crusader for better public health since 1984, when he became director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In contrast, Roberts, whose wife, Jane, is a Holy Cross grad, has come through by not being the crusading right-winger his critics feared when he became chief justice 15 years ago. Roberts, who got both his bachelor’s and law degrees from Harvard, has emerged as the court’s swing vote, keeping the Supreme Court from tilting so far to the right that it would be out of the mainstream. He has taken on a role formerly occupied by retired associate justices Anthony Kennedy (another Harvard guy) and Sandra Day O’Connor. In the Supreme Court term that ended last week, Roberts cast his lot with the four liberal justices in three significant cases, delighting liberals and confounding conservatives.
Roberts smacked down the Trump administration’s attempt to end DACA for young immigrants, expanded the federal ban on employment discrimination to include gay and transgender people, and struck down a restrictive abortion law. Liberals who hope Roberts will be the next David Souter, a liberal justice in conservative clothing, are probably getting ahead of themselves. He’s still very conservative.
But, as he did in using some creative logic to provide the decisive vote to uphold Obamacare eight years ago, Roberts will sometimes confound his conservative supporters by pushing back against the court’s slide to the right. If Fauci is being true to his Crusader roots, Roberts is emerging as the anti-crusader, a chief justice who cares more about preserving the court’s legitimacy than pleasing ideological soulmates.
It’s worth noting that Harvard educated at least four of the other justices on the current Supreme Court. And that Holy Cross produced the court’s arch conservative, Justice Clarence Thomas. But as Joe E. Brown observed in the final scene of “Some Like It Hot,” “Well, nobody’s perfect.” ________________________________________ Kevin Cullen is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at kevin.cullen@globe.com.
|
|
|
Post by matunuck on Jul 17, 2020 8:55:02 GMT -5
I don't think Cousy's been our most known alum for quite awhile.
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 17, 2020 9:09:36 GMT -5
Remember this is a Boston paper
|
|
|
Post by Tom on Jul 17, 2020 9:30:24 GMT -5
Remember this is a Boston paper and an extremely biased one The last two sentences certainly sound a bit biased
|
|
|
Post by alum on Jul 17, 2020 9:42:14 GMT -5
and an extremely biased one The last two sentences certainly sound a bit biased Which, given that he is a columnist and not a reporter, is to be expected. He also knows his audience which is probably why he didn't mention Ted Wells.
|
|
|
Post by ndgradbuthcfan on Jul 17, 2020 11:08:04 GMT -5
If biased means that it reflects the views of the vast majority of MA residents, then it's biased.
|
|
|
Post by CHC8485 on Jul 17, 2020 12:37:08 GMT -5
They forgot to add that former Justice Antonin Scalia had the good sense to send one of his sons, Paul Scalia, '92, to Holy Cross. He's now a priest and last I heard a pastor, in Virginia just outside DC.
While the ubiquity of Harvard and Yale LAW school alumni on the Supreme court is well know, I'm not sure there has ever been an undergraduate school (perhaps Harvard College) and definitely not one the size of Holy Cross, that had direct familial connections to 3 sitting supreme court justices.
|
|
|
Post by ndgradbuthcfan on Jul 17, 2020 13:26:35 GMT -5
If biased means that it reflects the views of the vast majority of MA residents, then it's biased. No, biased means that it has an agenda and promotes that regardless of facts to the contrary. Oh, you mean that it is not to be taken seriously because it doesn't tell the truth; that is funny.
|
|
|
Post by rickii on Jul 17, 2020 13:38:43 GMT -5
Getting in before the lock....
Given the flavor, the ad at the bottom of this thread are....interesting 😜
|
|
|
Post by WorcesterGray on Jul 17, 2020 14:30:22 GMT -5
"Please, sir, may we have another?"
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2020 11:40:14 GMT -5
|
|