|
Post by Tom on May 17, 2022 7:38:48 GMT -5
An email was sent to all students today announcing that Covid testing would become optional effective May 19 and confirming that commencement would be at the DCU and masks will be required. Graduation off campus inside an old and dark arena (where masks must be worn because better safe than sorry) vs. an outdoor graduation (the safest option?) at a beautiful football field on a beautiful campus. Leave it to HC to botch this. $$$ + ticket limits I agree that Fitton is a better place if the weather is nice. During renovation of Hart, TPTB decided that the Centrum was better than Hart. One advantage of the Centrum is that anyone can go. The only weather issue I witnessed, guests were limited to something like 4 per grad and over flow watched on close circuit from the hockey rink. Not an issue at the Centrum I'm kind of cheap by nature, and would hate the idea of paying for the Centrum as a back up plan and then not using it. It would be interesting to know how often graduation was moved inside. Do some old fashioned cost benefit analysis. Is it worth paying for the Centrum if weather forces you inside one out of ten years? What if weather forces you inside once every three ? I think the vast majority of the graduates would rather be at Fitton than the Centrum. For rainy years, I don't know if the majority of graduates would rather have granny watching on TV in a remote campus spot or live in the Centrum. Heck in this day and age with everyone zooming remotely for everything, maybe people aren't as opposed to closed circuit as I am
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on May 17, 2022 7:48:34 GMT -5
So, I know that both HC and Nichols have been using the Centrum for a number of years now. Are the other colleges in Worcester, like Clark, Assumption, WPI, etc. also using the Centrum?
Is it possible the ones using it are getting a group discount? 🤔
|
|
|
Post by Tom on May 17, 2022 9:05:58 GMT -5
So, I know that both HC and Nichols have been using the Centrum for a number of years now. Are the other colleges in Worcester, like Clark, Assumption, WPI, etc. also using the Centrum? Is it possible the ones using it are getting a group discount? 🤔 I would say possible. but unlikely. I don't think that Macy's and Gimbals ever combined purchasing for better discounts. If something did get worked out, at the very least I would assume the dates would have to be very close so as not to duplicate set up. Nichols graduated a week and a half ago. ------------------------ There can be advantages to going to an off campus arena. . . Not sure if this applies to HC graduation, but once I went to a college graduation in a local civic center and the place was running full concessions. Lots of people were enjoying an overpriced beer and hot dog during the ceremony. Very helpful if the speaker is long winded
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on May 17, 2022 10:22:08 GMT -5
Appreciate your metaphor effort but having worked at Macy’s along with most of my family and shopped at Gimbel’s before they went belly up, I don’t think Worcester colleges see themselves as competitors otherwise why the Worcester Consortium (still exists, I THINK?).
45’s grandson is a proud grad of Nichols this year and my son is a professor there so well aware of their graduation and your point of coordinating dates is spot on.
So, yes, probably no discounts per se but suspect all the colleges want to enhance their ties to the community and would hope the Centrum cuts them a break to do their part for town/gown relationships.
|
|
|
Post by longsuffering on May 17, 2022 10:56:30 GMT -5
Appreciate your metaphor effort but having worked at Macy’s along with most of my family and shopped at Gimbel’s before they went belly up, I don’t think Worcester colleges see themselves as competitors otherwise why the Worcester Consortium (still exists, I THINK?). 45’s grandson is a proud grad of Nichols this year and my son is a professor there so well aware of their graduation and your point of coordinating dates is spot on. So, yes, probably no discounts per se but suspect all the colleges want to enhance their ties to the community and would hope the Centrum cuts them a break to do their part for town/gown relationships. Even though Becker went out of business and the City can't really do that, the prevailing thinking seems to be the colleges should "give back" to the city and not the other way around. I agree that one college holding an afternoon graduation and splitting a day's rental with a college holding an evening graduation is a smart idea and should generally be a good deal for the schools and the venue, especially if they are selling concessions.
|
|
|
Post by timholycross on May 17, 2022 14:32:15 GMT -5
The field is on a flood plain.
|
|
|
Post by bfoley82 on May 17, 2022 17:46:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thecrossisback on May 18, 2022 22:37:16 GMT -5
Worcester State is at DCU.
|
|
|
Post by mm67 on May 20, 2022 19:19:57 GMT -5
Appreciate your metaphor effort but having worked at Macy’s along with most of my family and shopped at Gimbel’s before they went belly up, I don’t think Worcester colleges see themselves as competitors otherwise why the Worcester Consortium (still exists, I THINK?). 45’s grandson is a proud grad of Nichols this year and my son is a professor there so well aware of their graduation and your point of coordinating dates is spot on. So, yes, probably no discounts per se but suspect all the colleges want to enhance their ties to the community and would hope the Centrum cuts them a break to do their part for town/gown relationships. Old saying: "Does Macy's tell Gimbel's"? Worked at Macy's White Plains for a few years. It was beautiful store.
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on May 20, 2022 19:21:47 GMT -5
Ever do the Thanksgiving Day parade in NYC?
|
|
|
Post by mm67 on May 20, 2022 21:38:46 GMT -5
Ever do the Thanksgiving Day parade in NYC? Yeah. Went with my parents, when I was seven. Straddled my dad's shoulders for a bit. Never had the good fortune to work it. Worked Summers and Part-Time. Started in luggage then worked up the store management ladder. It was always a temporary stopgap in my youth, never a career. Resigned in '71. I have many good memories of my Macy's experience. Did you do Thanksgiving? What was it like?
|
|
|
Post by Crucis#1 on May 20, 2022 22:50:49 GMT -5
Attended the Macy’s parade twice.
First time in 1979, found a spot in Herald Square, after being delayed due to Metro North, so we did not see the entire parade from the beginning. Afterwards lunch in Chinatown.
The second time, in 1989 was with my kids. Had a front row viewing in Times Square. After the parade went to Battery Park, then over to the South Street Seaport for lunch. The second time to the parade was especially memorable to see the reaction from my son and daughter when Santa Claus arrived. For me it was seeing Buffalo Bob Smith and Howdy Doody only a couple of feet away from me. Howdy Doody was my favorite TV show before and when I was attending the early part of Elementary school.
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on May 21, 2022 4:44:09 GMT -5
Sorry for derailing this thread but to answer questions, I meant work the parade/be in it not attend.
In my case, I did neither. I worked 2 summers in the Bay Shore store; my Mom worked part time in the store manager’s office; Dad had a part time job as a “white flower” with his “real job” at Grumman; both sisters also worked there part time. Only my older brother didn’t work there at all.
When I moved back to LI, my wife worked in the Smithtown Mall store part time. Both my mother many years before and wife were asked if they wanted to participate working the parade. Neither felt they could do so though we joked my wife wasn’t big enough to keep a large balloon down and anchored.
We watched the parades religiously for years on TV while saying to the my wife “you could have been holding down Bullwinkle!”
And despite my LI roots I NEVER did the Times Square New Year’s deal. Had no appeal for me, especially when Guy Lombardo years were gone.
|
|
|
Post by longsuffering on May 23, 2022 20:00:58 GMT -5
Attended the Macy’s parade twice. First time in 1979, found a spot in Herald Square, after being delayed due to Metro North, so we did not see the entire parade from the beginning. Afterwards lunch in Chinatown. The second time, in 1989 was with my kids. Had a front row viewing in Times Square. After the parade went to Battery Park, then over to the South Street Seaport for lunch. The second time to the parade was especially memorable to see the reaction from my son and daughter when Santa Claus arrived. For me it was seeing Buffalo Bob Smith and Howdy Doody only a couple of feet away from me. Howdy Doody was my favorite TV show before and when I was attending the early part of Elementary school. Remember me to Herald Square.
|
|
|
Post by bfoley82 on May 23, 2022 20:49:54 GMT -5
Is HC going to require a Monkeypox vaccine in 2022-2023?
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on May 24, 2022 10:35:02 GMT -5
COVID totals from August 2020 through May 19, 2022. The majority of positive cases occurred during the spring 2022 semester.
Total student positive tests, internal HC-administered tests only. 1371 Total employee positive tests 391 Total other positive tests 4 (Other seems to include contractors/consultants working on campus who were tested by HC.) Total number of tests 314,971. The majority of the tests were done during the 2021-2022 academic year.
For the summer session and fall 2022 semester, students may self-test, using drop-box collection points located at several points around campus.
As of May 24th, I believe that all students who had tested positive are now cleared There will be no testing of seniors prior to commencement.
Masking at the DCU Center was specified by the Worcester Board of Health.
|
|
|
Post by td128 on May 25, 2022 7:52:27 GMT -5
ICYMI . . . Fauci's Researchers Find Better Antibody Response from Natural Immunity Than Moderna Vaccine justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/faucis-researchers-find-better-antibody-response-natural-immunityA month before America's top infectious disease bureaucrat conceded that mRNA vaccines offer only short-lived protection against COVID-19, Anthony Fauci's researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) offered a possible explanation why.
These vaccines target COVID's spike protein, whereas natural immunity recognizes the whole of the virus, including the nucleocapsid protein that envelops the RNA core.
Among those infected during the "blinded phase" of Moderna's 30,000-adult vaccine trial, only 40% of those given the vaccine developed anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. The figure was more than twice as high (93%) for those given the placebo.
While higher viral loads were associated with higher likelihood of developing anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, "viral copies at the illness visit did not fully explain the large difference" between vaccine and placebo groups, according to the preprint study, which hasn't been peer-reviewed.
"[F]or any given viral copy number," the odds of developing those antibodies were 13.67 times higher for the unvaccinated. A placebo recipient with a mild infection had a 71% chance of developing those antibodies, compared to 15% for a vaccine recipient. The two only start to converge at the highest viral loads.
"While an increase in seroreversion cannot be ruled out, given the short time frame the more likely explanation is a vaccine-induced reduction in seroconversion," or development of antibodies, the researchers wrote. The study period ended in March 2021, before the Delta and Omicron variants developed.
NIAID's Biostatistics Research Branch collaborated with Moderna, Seattle's Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the medical schools of Baylor, Cornell, Harvard and the University of Maryland on the study, which was posted April 19.
It does not appear to have received mainstream media coverage or been promoted by NIAID, even though it's labeled a "US Government work." Corresponding author Holly Janes of the cancer center, NIAID and Moderna did not respond to Just the News queries.
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936v1.full (Meaning Conclusions about the prevalence and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated persons based on anti-nucleocapsid antibody assays need to be weighed in the context of these results.)
"Some vaccine platforms give a very high degree of protection, but the durability isn't very long," Fauci told CNN last week. He doubts the short-lived immunity is "peculiar to coronavirus" as opposed to an inherent disadvantage in mRNA technology, which Fauci nonetheless called "a really great platform."
The comments echo Bill Gates' January criticism of the vaccines for their short-lived immunity and inability to prevent reinfection.
The next month, the COVID vaccine funder — dubbed a "superhero" by the National Institutes of Health — went so far as saying Omicron had "done a better job" of vaccinating the world with broad-spectrum immunity "than we have with vaccines."
The NIAID study could help explain the frequency of reinfections in America, "sometimes within months" of the previous dose, former New York Times drug research reporter Alex Berenson wrote in his newsletter.
It "essentially demolishes" the theory that because mRNA vaccines "prime people to fight off the Covid infections more quickly" they don't develop anti-N antibodies, he wrote. The blood measurements show a jabbed person needs nearly 100,000 times as much virus as a placebo to trigger the same chance of developing those antibodies.
While the "long-term immunological and medical significance" of the missing antibodies is up in the air, the nucleocapsid protein "mutates far more slowly" than does the spike protein, which in Omicron is all but unrecognizable to vaccines, Berenson said.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla himself said the company's vaccine had hit a brick wall against Omicron and then seemingly apologized for choosing "counterintuitive" mRNA technology, saying he just followed what underlings recommended.
COVID analyst Igor Chudov noted the researchers called their work an improvement over an Irish study that found "low rates of anti-N seroconversion" among Pfizer-vaccinated hospital healthcare workers, since the American study is a "randomized, placebo-controlled trial with systematic surveillance for infection."
Law professor Todd Zywicki, who successfully sued George Mason University to recognize his natural immunity as a "medical exemption" to its vaccine mandate, pointed Just the News to his March review of the risks for "original antigenic sin" from repeated doses of the same formulations against evolving variants.
Moderna's published phase 3 trials suggest that its vaccine gave recipients short-term immunity "at the expense of the long-term ability of the immune system to create a similar degree of robust, broad antibodies" against the 29 proteins in SARS-CoV-2, he wrote.
An October study in Spain compared the response of one- and two-dose recipients to the Wuhan, Alpha, Delta and Kappa variants, finding two doses were only effective against the original strain while the three variants drew a "relative loss of reactivity" from the second dose.
Zywicki also discounted the theory of vaccines clearing infections too fast for antibodies to develop. "In the first Moderna study, the same pattern was found for ASYMPTOMATIC infections — which is a good proxy for the ease of neutralizing the virus," he wrote in an email.
"It's an exaggeration" to say the study shows "mRNA vaccines hurt long-term immunity," as opposed to the problem of using anti-N antibodies as a marker for seroprevalence, Indiana University immunologist Steve Templeton told Just the News.
Templeton is skeptical how useful anti-N antibodies are "for neutralizing the virus, as the spike protein is more prominently displayed." He has previously questioned how much can be gleaned from waning antibodies.
"People forget that loss of or lack of antibody responses isn't automatically synonymous with a lost [sic] in strength of protection from severe disease," Templeton wrote in an email. "T cells are more important in that regard."
Proponents of vaccine mandates also "disingenuously" conflate a "transient spike in anti-S[pike] antibodies" with increased protection versus natural immunity, he argued.NAVIGATE ACCORDINGLY . . .
LET'S WIN!!
|
|
|
Post by td128 on May 25, 2022 8:05:38 GMT -5
in light of this recent news, I sent the following out this morning:
Friends, family and fellow Crusaders,
Where do all those who stood their ground and defied the vaccine mandates imposed by governmental forces et al that displayed an all too tyrannical approach go to collect on the abuse of their personal freedoms and liberties?
Moreover, where do those who took a vaccine due to governmental mandates and those of other entities yet against their better judgment and own informed consent now go for justice and fair compensation?
Lastly, who within our public offices will now move to hold those behind this greatest fraud ever perpetrated to justice for the various and sundry crimes involved including those against humanity?
Great questions deserving of real attention and greater answers.
Fight On!! I welcome this fight so that a fraud of this nature and size is never again imposed on mankind.
LD
P.S. For people of faith, is it really any surprise that the defenses God provided us in the form of natural immunity truly reign supreme?
Those of faith know that Our Lord and Savior Always Wins!! I’m with Him.
Does Holy Cross really want to put an individual's name on a building who was so clearly wrong and abusive in the development, funding, and distribution of such a product? Really? On Wall Street, always best to limit one's loss potential and then cut those losses if and as they exceeded it. ✝️🙏
|
|
|
Post by alum on May 25, 2022 8:48:35 GMT -5
in light of this recent news, I sent the following out this morning: Friends, family and fellow Crusaders,
Where do all those who stood their ground and defied the vaccine mandates imposed by governmental forces et al that displayed an all too tyrannical approach go to collect on the abuse of their personal freedoms and liberties?
Moreover, where do those who took a vaccine due to governmental mandates and those of other entities yet against their better judgment and own informed consent now go for justice and fair compensation?
Lastly, who within our public offices will now move to hold those behind this greatest fraud ever perpetrated to justice for the various and sundry crimes involved including those against humanity?
Great questions deserving of real attention and greater answers.
Fight On!! I welcome this fight so that a fraud of this nature and size is never again imposed on mankind.
LD
P.S. For people of faith, is it really any surprise that the defenses God provided us in the form of natural immunity truly reign supreme?
Those of faith know that Our Lord and Savior Always Wins!! I’m with Him.
Does Holy Cross really want to put an individual's name on a building who was so clearly wrong and abusive in the development, funding, and distribution of such a product? Really? On Wall Street, always best to limit one's loss potential and then cut those losses if and as they exceeded it. ✝️🙏So, a Supreme Being had time to create natural immunity to a disease that said Supreme Being presumably created, but doesn't have time to make sure that 19 little kids didn't get murdered yesterday? Why didn't God cause the justices of the Supreme Court to hold in Heller that the Second Amendment doesn't protect private ownership of guns. Then God could have caused the members of the Texas legislature to ban the sale of guns to teenagers, and ban the sale of semi automatic weapons, and ban the sale of large magazines. Maybe God could have helped the shooter's mother with her drug addiction. Maybe God could have just caused the shooter to miss. Blaming or crediting God for the shooter killing these kids yesterday, or the existence of the coronavirus, or natural immunity or vaccines seems blasphemous to me.
|
|
|
Post by newfieguy74 on May 25, 2022 8:58:56 GMT -5
"Lastly, who within our public offices will now move to hold those behind this greatest fraud ever perpetrated to justice for the various and sundry crimes involved including those against humanity?"
Rarely has a post on Crossports been as offensive or gone so far off the rails.
|
|
|
Post by Ray on May 25, 2022 9:30:09 GMT -5
in light of this recent news, I sent the following out this morning: ✝️🙏I don't know who you sent that to, but I can only hope the response was a lot of "unsubscribes".
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE The simple fact that they used the phrase "Fauci's researchers" in the open paragraph, as if they were his personal servants, should have been enough to question the agenda of the author. But for some reason, you can't see that. Frankly, it's very sad what's happened to you.
|
|
|
Post by longsuffering on May 25, 2022 9:47:30 GMT -5
ICYMI . . . Fauci's Researchers Find Better Antibody Response from Natural Immunity Than Moderna Vaccine justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/faucis-researchers-find-better-antibody-response-natural-immunityA month before America's top infectious disease bureaucrat conceded that mRNA vaccines offer only short-lived protection against COVID-19, Anthony Fauci's researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) offered a possible explanation why.
These vaccines target COVID's spike protein, whereas natural immunity recognizes the whole of the virus, including the nucleocapsid protein that envelops the RNA core.
Among those infected during the "blinded phase" of Moderna's 30,000-adult vaccine trial, only 40% of those given the vaccine developed anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. The figure was more than twice as high (93%) for those given the placebo.
While higher viral loads were associated with higher likelihood of developing anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, "viral copies at the illness visit did not fully explain the large difference" between vaccine and placebo groups, according to the preprint study, which hasn't been peer-reviewed.
"[F]or any given viral copy number," the odds of developing those antibodies were 13.67 times higher for the unvaccinated. A placebo recipient with a mild infection had a 71% chance of developing those antibodies, compared to 15% for a vaccine recipient. The two only start to converge at the highest viral loads.
"While an increase in seroreversion cannot be ruled out, given the short time frame the more likely explanation is a vaccine-induced reduction in seroconversion," or development of antibodies, the researchers wrote. The study period ended in March 2021, before the Delta and Omicron variants developed.
NIAID's Biostatistics Research Branch collaborated with Moderna, Seattle's Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the medical schools of Baylor, Cornell, Harvard and the University of Maryland on the study, which was posted April 19.
It does not appear to have received mainstream media coverage or been promoted by NIAID, even though it's labeled a "US Government work." Corresponding author Holly Janes of the cancer center, NIAID and Moderna did not respond to Just the News queries.
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936v1.full (Meaning Conclusions about the prevalence and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated persons based on anti-nucleocapsid antibody assays need to be weighed in the context of these results.)
"Some vaccine platforms give a very high degree of protection, but the durability isn't very long," Fauci told CNN last week. He doubts the short-lived immunity is "peculiar to coronavirus" as opposed to an inherent disadvantage in mRNA technology, which Fauci nonetheless called "a really great platform."
The comments echo Bill Gates' January criticism of the vaccines for their short-lived immunity and inability to prevent reinfection.
The next month, the COVID vaccine funder — dubbed a "superhero" by the National Institutes of Health — went so far as saying Omicron had "done a better job" of vaccinating the world with broad-spectrum immunity "than we have with vaccines."
The NIAID study could help explain the frequency of reinfections in America, "sometimes within months" of the previous dose, former New York Times drug research reporter Alex Berenson wrote in his newsletter.
It "essentially demolishes" the theory that because mRNA vaccines "prime people to fight off the Covid infections more quickly" they don't develop anti-N antibodies, he wrote. The blood measurements show a jabbed person needs nearly 100,000 times as much virus as a placebo to trigger the same chance of developing those antibodies.
While the "long-term immunological and medical significance" of the missing antibodies is up in the air, the nucleocapsid protein "mutates far more slowly" than does the spike protein, which in Omicron is all but unrecognizable to vaccines, Berenson said.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla himself said the company's vaccine had hit a brick wall against Omicron and then seemingly apologized for choosing "counterintuitive" mRNA technology, saying he just followed what underlings recommended.
COVID analyst Igor Chudov noted the researchers called their work an improvement over an Irish study that found "low rates of anti-N seroconversion" among Pfizer-vaccinated hospital healthcare workers, since the American study is a "randomized, placebo-controlled trial with systematic surveillance for infection."
Law professor Todd Zywicki, who successfully sued George Mason University to recognize his natural immunity as a "medical exemption" to its vaccine mandate, pointed Just the News to his March review of the risks for "original antigenic sin" from repeated doses of the same formulations against evolving variants.
Moderna's published phase 3 trials suggest that its vaccine gave recipients short-term immunity "at the expense of the long-term ability of the immune system to create a similar degree of robust, broad antibodies" against the 29 proteins in SARS-CoV-2, he wrote.
An October study in Spain compared the response of one- and two-dose recipients to the Wuhan, Alpha, Delta and Kappa variants, finding two doses were only effective against the original strain while the three variants drew a "relative loss of reactivity" from the second dose.
Zywicki also discounted the theory of vaccines clearing infections too fast for antibodies to develop. "In the first Moderna study, the same pattern was found for ASYMPTOMATIC infections — which is a good proxy for the ease of neutralizing the virus," he wrote in an email.
"It's an exaggeration" to say the study shows "mRNA vaccines hurt long-term immunity," as opposed to the problem of using anti-N antibodies as a marker for seroprevalence, Indiana University immunologist Steve Templeton told Just the News.
Templeton is skeptical how useful anti-N antibodies are "for neutralizing the virus, as the spike protein is more prominently displayed." He has previously questioned how much can be gleaned from waning antibodies.
"People forget that loss of or lack of antibody responses isn't automatically synonymous with a lost [sic] in strength of protection from severe disease," Templeton wrote in an email. "T cells are more important in that regard."
Proponents of vaccine mandates also "disingenuously" conflate a "transient spike in anti-S[pike] antibodies" with increased protection versus natural immunity, he argued.NAVIGATE ACCORDINGLY . . .
LET'S WIN!! So are you saying the vast majority of the one million Americans dead from Covid were fully vaccinated and boosted and very few unvaccinated were hospitalized, placed in an ICU, put on a ventilator or died? Urging people to avoid vaccination and get infected to develop the best immunity doesn't pass ethical muster, does it? I don't understand where the tremendous passion comes from to destroy the American success story of President Trump's vaccines. He was hospitalized while unvaccinated and out and about now while being fully vaccinated and boosted (and booed for being so.) Give us a sense of what fuels the passion to fight the U.S. government over this. I for one felt they had my aging back during this pandemic and was appreciative there was an age related priority for receiving the vaccine for free and free test kits and masks have been sent to me, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on May 25, 2022 9:55:17 GMT -5
On the increasing incidence of Long COVID. www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7121e1.htm?s_cid=mm7121e1_w&utm_source=STAT+Newsletters&utm_campaign=1cd833a7e2-MR_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8cab1d7961-1cd833a7e2-151507929_____________________________ With respect to another post today citing a pre-print study on different antibody response to a naturally-occurring COVID infection , and to an inoculation with an mRNA COVID vaccine. This study was done in the earlier days of the pandemic, before Delta and Omicron. As I read this, the sicker you were with COVID, the higher was the titer of a particular antibody. Makes sense to me. The more virus particles (inoculus) you inhale, the sicker you are. (Not a perfect correlation, but more a rule of thumb.) Remember the cytokine storms that were often the body's response to a naturally occurring COVID infection? An immune system gone haywire, sometimes fatally. Don't read about those anymore. Wonder why? The researchers were Moderna, and the research was done during trials of Moderna's vaccine.
|
|
|
Post by longsuffering on May 25, 2022 9:56:04 GMT -5
in light of this recent news, I sent the following out this morning: Friends, family and fellow Crusaders,
Where do all those who stood their ground and defied the vaccine mandates imposed by governmental forces et al that displayed an all too tyrannical approach go to collect on the abuse of their personal freedoms and liberties?
Moreover, where do those who took a vaccine due to governmental mandates and those of other entities yet against their better judgment and own informed consent now go for justice and fair compensation?
Lastly, who within our public offices will now move to hold those behind this greatest fraud ever perpetrated to justice for the various and sundry crimes involved including those against humanity?
Great questions deserving of real attention and greater answers.
Fight On!! I welcome this fight so that a fraud of this nature and size is never again imposed on mankind.
LD
P.S. For people of faith, is it really any surprise that the defenses God provided us in the form of natural immunity truly reign supreme?
Those of faith know that Our Lord and Savior Always Wins!! I’m with Him.
Does Holy Cross really want to put an individual's name on a building who was so clearly wrong and abusive in the development, funding, and distribution of such a product? Really? On Wall Street, always best to limit one's loss potential and then cut those losses if and as they exceeded it. ✝️🙏Yes. I want Dr. Fauci's name closely associated with my Alma Mater. I'm very proud of both. It's a tribute to all who worked so hard to make the Holy Cross pre-med program so good for so long and a great way to advertise it is still going strong and helping the world.
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on May 25, 2022 10:04:26 GMT -5
The CEO of a pharmaceutical company announcing on Tuesday that he he was donating $355 million to charity. The name of the company I've blocked out, but it is mentioned up-thread.
The following sentence in that announcement.
|
|