|
Post by ncaam on Apr 18, 2018 20:54:08 GMT -5
ADNP is completing his 4th (?) season. 25 sports x 4 = 100. Among those 100 competitions how many regular season titles have we won? (This excludes the five wins in March and 2017 baseball). I want to say zero but maybe women’s hockey had success. Is it time for an AD change?
|
|
|
Post by cmo on Apr 18, 2018 21:17:36 GMT -5
Out of curiosity, Why are those 2 excluded?
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on Apr 19, 2018 6:25:55 GMT -5
I don’t have the time to check out the results this year much less over the last 4 years but I occasionally check the HC athletics site “ticker” of results and upcoming events and the impression is that we are losing almost every athletic event.
If we are getting a boost from LAC, it hasn’t happened yet.
If Nate is looking to upgrade his job elsewhere, the wins better kick in soon as raising funds will get him only so far and results on the field and court are going to have a career impact.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Apr 19, 2018 6:51:13 GMT -5
Don't blame D Pine, the problem is the admissions office. Ask any coach how they feel about the admissions and you will get a ear full. The AD does not recruit.
|
|
|
Post by rgs318 on Apr 19, 2018 6:51:21 GMT -5
"Figures don't lie, but liars can figure" is an old quote. Any school in America can look bad if the evaluation is based on something like this: "Look at our team records, but don't count the championships we won." Yes, HC is going through a rough patch...no argument there. But to not see the improvement and the potential for further improvement is a sign that one is only posting propaganda. Yes, propaganda.."the selective presentation of facts to prove a predetermined point of view."
If you don't think we are getting a most yet from the LAC (in its first year), then you may have missed the many times it has been referred to as one reason why some good athletes are interested in HC. It is a huge step up and as team records improve, it may well become even bigger.
There is a theory in history known as the Devil Theory. It is that blame is typically put on one person or group to explain any negative ones encounters. That is the easy way to do it. There are countless examples of this theory in history. Would the Civil War have been avoided/ended and all regional problems diminished if we could just "Hang Jeff Davis From a Sour Apple Tree?" Not likely. The Kaiser was not the reason for the First World War. And, the many problems faced by HC athletics do not all result from decisions made by Nate Pine - as at last one or two posters might like to believe. He is a good athletic director doing an admirable job on Mt St James. He has a solid reputation among those in college athletic administration. The task he has taken on is huge (and the future of Holy Cross will be strongly influenced by how successful he may be now and in the future). If NP cannot get the Crusaders back on track, perhaps no one can. I support HC athletics and I support the man who leads the program along with the staff he has assembled. (Just for the record.)
|
|
|
Post by ncaam on Apr 19, 2018 7:11:54 GMT -5
Methinks you are doing the figuring. ADNP not alone. Coaches, ADNP, Mr V and Fr Boroughs, inter alia, are responsible.
|
|
|
Post by nhteamer on Apr 19, 2018 7:22:33 GMT -5
OK let's go;
Fr BROOKS is responsible
|
|
|
Post by A Clock Tower Purple on Apr 19, 2018 7:24:44 GMT -5
Out of curiosity, Why are those 2 excluded? Because it doesn't support hc70's narrative.
|
|
|
Post by ncaam on Apr 19, 2018 7:44:25 GMT -5
OK, you’ve added the miracle of five games in March. Now discuss the rest of the program. The four years and 100 attempts at season winning success and I daresay lack there of. For what it’s worth the Luth has not won a game yet.
|
|
|
Post by CHC8485 on Apr 19, 2018 8:01:35 GMT -5
Since the topic is HC athletics, not the 3 sports one poster cares about ...
Standings in the President's Cup thru the end of the winter sports would say flat perhaps slightly improved but hardly a nadir.
PL President's Cup Standings through Winter (13 Sports)
|
| Rank
|
|
|
|
| Points
| Earned
|
| | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
| 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | Bucknell | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 93.5 | 92 | 85.5 | 97 | Navy | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 87 | 84.25 | 79.5 | 86.75 | Army | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 76.75 | 73.25 | 78 | 69.5 | Lehigh | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| 76 | 76.25 | 76.25 | 73 | Boston | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 68.5 | 79 | 83.75 | 80.5 | American | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 55 | 53.5 | 60.25 | 58.5 | Holy Cross | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| 52.25 | 46.5 | 51.5 | 46.5 | Colgate | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| 51 | 53.5 | 53 | 53.75 | Loyola | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 |
| 39.75 | 33.5 | 29.5 | 41.5 | Lafayette | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | | 36.75 | 33.5 | 29.5 | 41.5 |
Oh and BTW ncaam - how many championships were won in the 4 years prior to ADNP's arrival? I'll let you do that homework.
|
|
|
Post by Sons of Vaval on Apr 19, 2018 8:12:33 GMT -5
But to not see the improvement and the potential for further improvement is a sign that one is only posting propaganda. Where is the improvement?
|
|
|
Post by Sons of Vaval on Apr 19, 2018 8:17:29 GMT -5
Oh and BTW ncaam - how many championships were won in the 4 years prior to ADNP's arrival? I'll let you do that homework.
Dick Regan wasn't blessed with the budget and facilities that Nate Pine has at his disposal. You could also argue that Regan left Pine with the two best coaches at HC (DiCenzo and Pearl) when he departed. Since becoming AD, I'm not sure which programs Pine has significantly improved.
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on Apr 19, 2018 8:26:31 GMT -5
8485, thanks for the stats. Not being a math major, the President's Cup rankings look pretty much like a plateau - 8th to 7th not a big improvement. However, I don't especially care about that standard (unless we were regularly #1, then it would be critically important ). I hope RGS wasn't lumping me in with some other posters. My only point was that very early on in his time with HC, NP was looked at as the guy who would drag the school over the financial hump to get the LAC and perhaps improve the "brand" of HC athletics and then move on to a bigger (read: better) job. I think he has succeeded most admirably financially though he is also known for greatly increasing the staffing in the Athletic Department. As for "branding," not as great a success IMHO. I think TPTB took the lazy way out and chose his purple shield HC logo. No, I don't blame him for that. But I stand by my prior statement that HC teams have to turn a corner and start producing more wins before he can be truly seen as "successful" at HC. Just my opinion. I hope he succeeds, not only for him but more importantly, for Holy Cross. We may not be at a nadir but we are still a very far cry from successful.
|
|
|
Post by bringbackcaro on Apr 19, 2018 8:59:49 GMT -5
We have ZERO D1 teams with a winning record this year. ZERO.
A look at how the coaches who NP hired have done this year: Men's Basketball: 12-19 (.387) -- 3 players suspended indefinitely, second year in a row with major rule/law violations Men's Hockey: 13-16-7 (.458) -- Coach has an absolutely horrific postseason record during his tenure at HC Men's Lacrosse: 4-8 (.333) -- 1-7 (.125) under the coach who NP hired, who is now suspended indefinitely Field Hockey: 7-11 (.389) Women's Lacrosse: 5-10 (.333) Women's Soccer: 4-9-4 (.353) Softball: 9-25 (.265) Volleyball: 5-24 (.172)
Only team above .400 is Men's Hockey, which has been very disappointing on the whole over Berard's tenure (maybe we shouldn't have just kicked Pearl to the curb?).
Overall record for these teams: 59-122-11 (.336) Remove Softball & Volleyball: 45-73-11 (.391)
Anyone who thinks that things are going well has their head up their (or NP's) you-know-where.
|
|
|
Post by bringbackcaro on Apr 19, 2018 9:05:19 GMT -5
... If NP cannot get the Crusaders back on track, perhaps no one can. ... That's a preposterous statement, RGS. NP has shown absolutely no ability in understanding how to hire and develop coaches -- one of the most important jobs of an Athletic Director.
|
|
|
Post by rgs318 on Apr 19, 2018 9:10:06 GMT -5
OK, you’ve added the miracle of five games in March. Now discuss the rest of the program. The four years and 100 attempts at season winning success and I daresay lack there of. For what it’s worth the Luth has not won a game yet. Since players and teams win games and buildings don't, of course, it never will...especially when four years ago (the time frame you mention) I don't believe they even broken ground yet.
|
|
|
Post by ncaam on Apr 19, 2018 9:30:49 GMT -5
You keep avoiding my main question. Where are the first place season long finishes?
|
|
|
Post by CHC8485 on Apr 19, 2018 10:03:06 GMT -5
Question was posed about HC athletics being at a nadir. Objective results against our primary competition (and only real means to measure year-over-year progress) says no, it's not at a nadir.
ADNP is not being measured by championships alone. And if that's the standard, we've been failing that for 25 years.
Win percentage. Fine it's bad, but how does it compare to the prior 4-5 years?
President's Cup. Plateaued/treading water is a fair assessment, but again how does that look compared to the prior 5 years
Other measures - NCAA & school norm compliance (for lack of a better term), graduation rates, community involvement, brand awareness, completing the Luth on-time and within budget and I'm sure several others are all things I'm sure ADNP is assessed on.
If I'm on the BOT at HC I'm absolutely asking a lot of pointed questions about "4 years in, what are we getting for the increased spending, how are you/we measuring success, and when will we see results that will translate into achieving the objectives we set when we increased the athletic budgets."
But if you're asking "Is HC athletics at its Nadir?" My answer is nope.
|
|
|
Post by purplehaze on Apr 19, 2018 10:25:46 GMT -5
Another barometer of how lousy our results are - after BU's softball team swept 3 games from us last weekend and last night their women's lax team blew us out, the famed 'Turnpike Trophy' competition for 2017-18 stands at 15-4. Let's drop this silly thing, we can't compete with the 'Terrier' powerhouse.
|
|
|
Post by WCHC Sports on Apr 19, 2018 10:32:28 GMT -5
Don't blame D Pine, the problem is the admissions office. Ask any coach how they feel about the admissions and you will get a ear full. The AD does not recruit. Admissions office catches a bad rap for at least the 15 years I paid attention to this board. Sure, the easy answer is let kids in who can't read but can dunk from the free throw line... or 280 lb mooses onto the football team that don't know what a moose looks like... Aren't there smart kids that can ball too? Why can't we recruit or coach or develop THEM. That's not an admissions department cop out. That does speak to the ability to compete, attract, retain, and develop those assets... certain things that the AD and athletics/college more broadly can do in spite of tough admissions standard (if I debate you on those grounds).
|
|
|
Post by ncaam on Apr 19, 2018 14:05:29 GMT -5
Question was posed about HC athletics being at a nadir. Objective results against our primary competition (and only real means to measure year-over-year progress) says no, it's not at a nadir. ADNP is not being measured by championships alone. And if that's the standard, we've been failing that for 25 years. Win percentage. Fine it's bad, but how does it compare to the prior 4-5 years? President's Cup. Plateaued/treading water is a fair assessment, but again how does that look compared to the prior 5 years Other measures - NCAA & school norm compliance (for lack of a better term), graduation rates, community involvement, brand awareness, completing the Luth on-time and within budget and I'm sure several others are all things I'm sure ADNP is assessed on. If I'm on the BOT at HC I'm absolutely asking a lot of pointed questions about "4 years in, what are we getting for the increased spending, how are you/we measuring success, and when will we see results that will translate into achieving the objectives we set when we increased the athletic budgets." But if you're asking "Is HC athletics at its Nadir?" My answer is nope. [br If he is being measured by the “other measures” then Doris start loading the car.
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on Apr 19, 2018 16:58:04 GMT -5
Lets compare how much athletically-related financial aid HC awarded compared to the rest of the PL.
Two years, 2012-13, which was DR, and 2016-17 which was NP
Women;s athletically-related financial aid 2016-17 HC ranked 5 of 8 schools 2012-13 HC ranked 3 of 8 schools
Men;s athletically related financial aid 2016-17 HC ranked 5 of 8 (two non-football schools (Loyola and AU) and Lafayette ranked lower) 2012-13 HC ranked 4 of 8 (three schools above and Bucknell ranked lower)
And mind you, three of the PL schools award scollies for men's ice hockey: BostonU, Colgate, and HC.. Colgate spent about $2 million more than HC on fin aid for athletes in 2016-17, that's roughly 30 full scollies difference.
You can't get a winning percentage if you don't pay for the talent.
|
|
|
Post by sader1970 on Apr 19, 2018 17:16:56 GMT -5
OK, PP. Now throw in coaches salaries, facilities maintenance and travel expenses. Any change? Athletic spending is more than just schollie costs. If HC hired Rick Pitino, schollies would be the same but our overall expenses would go up as I think he'd want more than Carmody is getting.
|
|
|
Post by Pakachoag Phreek on Apr 19, 2018 19:17:31 GMT -5
OK, PP. Now throw in coaches salaries, facilities maintenance and travel expenses. Any change? Athletic spending is more than just schollie costs. If HC hired Rick Pitino, schollies would be the same but our overall expenses would go up as I think he'd want more than Carmody is getting. Geographic location introduces a disparity in salaries. For example, American's four (FTE) head coaches for men's teams had an average salary in 2016-17 of $136,000, Boston U eight head coaches had an average salary of $191,000, Holy Cross 9.25 head coaches had an average salary of $125,000. HC's average salary is $5,000 more than Lehigh's.. __________________________ Total expenses for four of the five PL football schools and BostU for men's sports were all between $12.4M and $12.9M Lafayette was $11.2M (Of those six schools, HC is the only one playing football, baseball, and ice hockey. (Several of the schools have wrestling and water polo teams.) Total expenses for women's sports, HC ranked 5 of 8, behind AU, Lafayette, and Loyola. Using the number of head coaches for women's sports as a proxy for number of teams, AU had six head coaches, Loyola had 6.35, Lafayette 7.25, and HC 10.25.
|
|
|
Post by hcpride on Apr 19, 2018 19:46:51 GMT -5
We have ZERO D1 teams with a winning record this year. ZERO. A look at how the coaches who NP hired have done this year: Men's Basketball: 12-19 (.387) -- 3 players suspended indefinitely, second year in a row with major rule/law violationsMen's Hockey: 13-16-7 (.458) -- Coach has an absolutely horrific postseason record during his tenure at HC Men's Lacrosse: 4-8 (.333) -- 1-7 (.125) under the coach who NP hired, who is now suspended indefinitely Field Hockey: 7-11 (.389)Women's Lacrosse: 5-10 (.333)Women's Soccer: 4-9-4 (.353)Softball: 9-25 (.265)Volleyball: 5-24 (.172)Only team above .400 is Men's Hockey, which has been very disappointing on the whole over Berard's tenure (maybe we shouldn't have just kicked Pearl to the curb?). Overall record for these teams: 59-122-11 (.336)Remove Softball & Volleyball: 45-73-11 (.391)
Anyone who thinks that things are going well has their head up their (or NP's) you-know-where. Athletically, a general disaster. Of course we could be worse. But every situation could be worse.
|
|