Chuck Hare

Watched most of the first half.
Some observations.
1- not a strong level of hoops, on either side. St.Andrew’s must struggle in AA.
His opposing centers were shorter, with similar skills to Chuck.
2- Despite not having a high level of athleticism, Hare showed multiple skills.
3- Running the court on every possession
4- Catching every pass thrown to him with two hands
5- Pursuing rebounds in his area
6- turning over each shoulder and using the proper hand to shoot.
7- Making correct decisions on when to pass or shoot
8- Can make a 3
9- Active on defense, keeps his hands high:
A- can block his own opponent’s shot in low.
B- can deflect and on one occasion steal the ball
C- committed no fouls when I was watching(keeping hands high helps)

If I think of more, I will add.
I believe he will help us rather quickly, especially against bigs of similar size.
It will take longer for him to cover quicker centers.
At worse, I see him spelling Caleb for 10-15 minutes, which would allow Caleb to play some 4.

What is his listed height and weight ?

If Caleb plays full time 4, that leaves out Joe N, who is not a 3
 Caleb at the 4, unless he develops into a shooter, puts one less shooter on the floor.
Hare can make them, but I am not sure that is a consistently reliable team weapon

You wrote, “..better than our other 5s”.
Whom are you thinking of ?
Ryan is the only one I can think of.

I was thinking 15-20 min per game for Hare —sorry for not being more clear

Certainly is, but the decisions made by the group we signed appear to be better than what we have seen from others this year. But time will tell

Thanks PH

Do you know what his injury is ?

The injury is not serious.