|
Post by Sader Fan on Sept 9, 2018 21:33:32 GMT -5
The Boston Globe columnist and HC Alum Dan Shaughnessy believes that our playing BC is a mistake, in part as evidenced by the lopsided score. However look at the other PL scores this week that were also lopsided:
Villanova 31 Lehigh 9
Sacred Heart 30 Bucknell 14
Delaware 37 Lafayette 0
Richmond 52 Fordham 7
And Georgetown lost to a team I never heard of before.
All the other PL schools got blown out by FCS schools.
HC was soundly beaten by an FBS team from the ACC, a power Conference, got support from over 15,000 fans, most of whom enjoyed themselves at the game (including me) and got paid $250,000 to boot.
I think HC did better than any of the other PL schools (except Colgate who beat UNH). Bravo for scheduling BC. I will be back in a couple of years for our next meeting.
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Sept 10, 2018 10:33:40 GMT -5
Anyone who thinks the game "shouldn't have been played" doesn't know college football. 100+ FBS/FCS matchups occur every year and most Power 5 teams play one of these games. Plenty of these games are LOCAL matchups as well -- Northern Arizona plays Arizona or Arizona State almost every year. Northern Iowa plays Iowa or Iowa state every year. Richmond and William & Mary play either UVA or Virginia Tech most years if not a bus trip to another ACC team. Michigan State and Michigan play the directional Michigan schools frequently (not FCS but may as well be). Villanova/Temple is the closest crossover matchup to being considered an actual rivalry at this point. Even schools like VMI and Wagner schedule strong FBS teams year after year.
Trying to give Shaugnessey the benefit of the doubt, I couldn't tell 100% whether he was implying that HC-BC should never be played again or that it should simply no longer be considered a rivalry any more -- "HC-BC -- Better Left in the Past", read into that headline as you will. However, he did conclude the article stating that most of the Crusader players and alum were proud and happy that the game was played, regardless of the score. He also threw a barb at the officials for calling back our only offensive TD of the game down 62-14.
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Sept 10, 2018 10:42:55 GMT -5
Would you please post the article
|
|
|
Post by rickii on Sept 10, 2018 12:36:05 GMT -5
While waiting for 2010 to post the article.... Addazio Last week I opined that, IMO, he was not a Saban, Meyer or Petrino dirt bag type and would likely call off the dogs when this game got out of hand. I was wrong. At 48-0 late in the 3rd it was obviously long over. I'm totally aware he had yanked the starters at the end of the 1st ( 21-0 ), played the 2nd team in the 2nd and had mostly 3rd teamers playing at 48-0 late in the 3rd. When we somehow blocked that first punt, the purple clad fans erupted loudly - twas terrific to hear ! But I noticed Addazio really let his 3rd teamers have it on the sideline which led to BC/Addazio calling the first UNNECESSARY long pass play call for a TD to make it 55-7. When we then unbelievably blocked the other punt ( 5-6 minutes left ? ) to make it 55-14 ( with another great purple fan roar ), he looked ticked-off. 55-14 wasn't good enough. He called ANOTHER TOTALLY UNNECESSARY long pass play....versus our 2nd/3rd teamers !!! ( which he knew ) for the 62-14 final. Now, don't anyone here give me the BS that this is 'big-boy' football or 'you play the game till the clock says 00' garbage. Chesney had rightfully raised the white flag, Addazio knew it and yet he still called/permitted a pass play to get 62 points instead of 55 on the scoreboard. WHY ? So that's my opinion...Addazio is now a gutterball to me....and really hope he gets his arse kicked by Wake Forest on ESPN Thursday night ! Regretably, it's now 50-50 that game will be played due to the approaching hurricane bearing down on the Carolinas.
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Sept 10, 2018 12:57:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Sept 10, 2018 13:03:13 GMT -5
While waiting for 2010 to post the article.... Addazio Last week I opined that, IMO, he was not a Saban, Meyer or Petrino dirt bag type and would likely call off the dogs when this game got out of hand. I was wrong. At 48-0 late in the 3rd it was obviously long over. I'm totally aware he had yanked the starters at the end of the 1st ( 21-0 ), played the 2nd team in the 2nd and had mostly 3rd teamers playing at 48-0 late in the 3rd. When we somehow blocked that first punt, the purple clad fans erupted loudly - twas terrific to hear ! But I noticed Addazio really let his 3rd teamers have it on the sideline which led to BC/Addazio calling the first UNNECESSARY long pass play call for a TD to make it 55-7. When we then unbelievably blocked the other punt ( 5-6 minutes left ? ) to make it 55-14 ( with another great purple fan roar ), he looked ticked-off. 55-14 wasn't good enough. He called ANOTHER TOTALLY UNNECESSARY long pass play....versus our 2nd/3rd teamers !!! ( which he knew ) for the 62-14 final. Now, don't anyone here give me the BS that this is 'big-boy' football or 'you play the game till the clock says 00' garbage. Chesney had rightfully raised the white flag, Addazio knew it and yet he still called/permitted a pass play to get 62 points instead of 55 on the scoreboard. WHY ? So that's my opinion...Addazio is now a gutterball to me....and really hope he gets his arse kicked by Wake Forest on ESPN Thursday night ! Regretably, it's now 50-50 that game will be played due to the approaching hurricane bearing down on the Carolinas. I definitely TOOK NOTE of the fact that BC's last two TD's were scored via the air but am not taking much exception. These were third-stringers on the field who may not get the chance to score again this season, if not for the rest of their careers. Throwing a long pass from midfield to score quickly would be much more unsportsmanlike IMO than a play action pass in the Red Zone.
Looking back, however, to our 55-0 blowout win against Georgetown in 2007, I do not recall us passing AT ALL in the second half. Even with our third and fourth offense in, we ran up the middle every play. The highlight of that game, for me, was PK Kyle DiLella booting the final PAT. The kick turned out to be the only points of his career as he was stuck behind his classmate Matt Partain on the HC depth chart.
|
|
|
Post by purplehaze on Sept 10, 2018 13:52:39 GMT -5
Some embarrassing pl scores (and I'm not talking about us) especially Fordham's 52-7 loss at Richmond. only two of seven league teams could muster more than 200 yards of total offense (Colgate and G'town). Fordham and Lafayette had negative rushing yards.
We need some positive ooc results, and soon !
|
|
|
Post by hcpride on Sept 10, 2018 14:05:12 GMT -5
While waiting for 2010 to post the article.... Addazio Last week I opined that, IMO, he was not a Saban, Meyer or Petrino dirt bag type and would likely call off the dogs when this game got out of hand. I was wrong. At 48-0 late in the 3rd it was obviously long over. I'm totally aware he had yanked the starters at the end of the 1st ( 21-0 ), played the 2nd team in the 2nd and had mostly 3rd teamers playing at 48-0 late in the 3rd. Addazio sat his superstar running back and a bunch of other players when BC hit 21 (6:55 into the game... NOT the end of the 1st quarter): Yanking The Starters Early: There were plenty of people out there that though Daz did the wrong thing by pulling AJ Dillon, Kobay White, much of the O-Line, Tommy Sweeney and Anthony Brown when the Eagles went up 21-0. Look, there wasn’t anything they could show against a team like Holy Cross. BC Interruption. AJ Dillon ran just 6 times for 149 yards and 3 TDs during the three consecutive series that culminated at 6:55. (Some predicted he'd boost his Heisman standing by running for 300+ yards) After 1 more series, Addazio yanked his star QB. And called off the dogs. BC could have scored 100 on us (I don't believe this is an exaggeration.) It is true Addazio was pissed following each blocked punt and it is also true his 3rd string Redshirt Freshman QB threw two long TD's late in the game I thought were unnecessary. But on balance the coach showed very good sportsmanship.
|
|
|
Post by crusader12 on Sept 10, 2018 14:24:48 GMT -5
While waiting for 2010 to post the article.... Addazio Last week I opined that, IMO, he was not a Saban, Meyer or Petrino dirt bag type and would likely call off the dogs when this game got out of hand. I was wrong. At 48-0 late in the 3rd it was obviously long over. I'm totally aware he had yanked the starters at the end of the 1st ( 21-0 ), played the 2nd team in the 2nd and had mostly 3rd teamers playing at 48-0 late in the 3rd. When we somehow blocked that first punt, the purple clad fans erupted loudly - twas terrific to hear ! But I noticed Addazio really let his 3rd teamers have it on the sideline which led to BC/Addazio calling the first UNNECESSARY long pass play call for a TD to make it 55-7. When we then unbelievably blocked the other punt ( 5-6 minutes left ? ) to make it 55-14 ( with another great purple fan roar ), he looked ticked-off. 55-14 wasn't good enough. He called ANOTHER TOTALLY UNNECESSARY long pass play....versus our 2nd/3rd teamers !!! ( which he knew ) for the 62-14 final. Now, don't anyone here give me the BS that this is 'big-boy' football or 'you play the game till the clock says 00' garbage. Chesney had rightfully raised the white flag, Addazio knew it and yet he still called/permitted a pass play to get 62 points instead of 55 on the scoreboard. WHY ? So that's my opinion...Addazio is now a gutterball to me....and really hope he gets his arse kicked by Wake Forest on ESPN Thursday night ! Regretably, it's now 50-50 that game will be played due to the approaching hurricane bearing down on the Carolinas. Agree 100%. Going for it on all the 4th downs in the 3rd and 4th Q. I have no respect for Addazio and it's typical BC arrogance. 2020 can't come soon enough.....
|
|
|
Post by lou on Sept 10, 2018 14:26:06 GMT -5
First O'Melia award winner to carry the ball only 6 times?
|
|
|
Post by matunuck on Sept 10, 2018 14:33:10 GMT -5
W&M got smoked by VA Tech but you can bet they're not about to cancel such games in the future.
|
|
|
Post by hcpride on Sept 10, 2018 14:33:12 GMT -5
Colgate, IMHO the top PL team, would have lost to BC by the same margin (and a much greater margin if Adazzio kept his starters in longer).
If our goal is to be the top PL team and make the FCS playoffs each year, we are really not closing the gap with BC (Which would have been larger if Adazzio kept his starters in longer).
Which is why I am not a fan of playing BC. I may be alone in my opinion but I thought the game was a bit of a humiliation (sort of like what Yale did to us by taking a knee and trying not to score in that debacle...but worse).
|
|
|
Post by hcpride on Sept 10, 2018 16:31:51 GMT -5
W&M got smoked by VA Tech but you can bet they're not about to cancel such games in the future. If they can rebuild and challenge for their league title, they can be competitive in games v Virginia Tech (some years). Heck, Villanova from that same league just beat FBS Temple.
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Sept 10, 2018 16:49:52 GMT -5
W&M got smoked by VA Tech but you can bet they're not about to cancel such games in the future. If they can rebuild and challenge for their league title, they can be competitive in games v Virginia Tech (some years). Heck, Villanova from that same league just beat FBS Temple. William & Mary may never beat Tech in my lifetime (at this rate UVA might not either). We may never beat BC in my lifetime. But the games will continue and for good reason. I expect the Eagles will schedule us at least every 3-5 years moving forward barring the ACC doing something like the Big Ten did and either ban or restrict the scheduling of FCS games. Or, of course, Holy Cross decides to drop or reduce scholarship aid.
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Sept 10, 2018 16:51:49 GMT -5
Paywall please post article
|
|
|
Post by Chu Chu on Sept 10, 2018 16:58:18 GMT -5
Interesting article, but the 72 comments after it were more fun to read!
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Sept 10, 2018 17:22:45 GMT -5
Chu chu - thanks for directing me to read the comments section online. Totally worth the 15 minutes, which is extremely rare for an online newspaper comments section. I wonder if any of the comments were Crossports members.
|
|
|
Post by purplehaze on Sept 10, 2018 17:37:41 GMT -5
Not a PL blowout, but as an aside, James Madison played only one qtr at Norfolk St, and won the game 17-0, officially because of lightening (which I am sure is true). But because the one qtr was so one-sided, JMU got the 'W'. Under more equal talent conditions, surely there would not have been a winner declared.
|
|
|
Post by Chu Chu on Sept 10, 2018 18:26:04 GMT -5
Chu chu - thanks for directing me to read the comments section online. Totally worth the 15 minutes, which is extremely rare for an online newspaper comments section. I wonder if any of the comments were Crossports members. I wondered the same thing!
|
|