|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2021 12:23:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 18, 2021 14:48:47 GMT -5
This will devolve into a brutal competition for player payments within the Power-5 schools world. Wait until we see what Alabama, Ohio State, and Michigan start paying. It's a great time to be a star running back or quarterback, even better to be a HS senior star running back or QB.
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 18, 2021 15:21:14 GMT -5
It will be interesting to see how Notre Dame approaches this new world.
i can only imagine what U Texas will do--think about the pressure on the football program from its wealthy boosters
|
|
|
Post by efg72 on Jul 18, 2021 17:38:36 GMT -5
If you flip this on it's head, those players who feel ignored or marginalized might be great targets for 1AA programs
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2021 19:31:26 GMT -5
Good point, but most players will not realize they got the short end of the stick until they are already at the Power 5 school. The bigger effect would probably be in the already enormous transfer portal.
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Jul 18, 2021 21:33:37 GMT -5
Good point, but most players will not realize they got the short end of the stick until they are already at the Power 5 school. The bigger effect would probably be in the already enormous transfer portal. 100%. There will definitely be some monetary value to being a star player at one of the FCS schools with larger followings. Or a G5 with a rabid fanbase, like Boise State, Hawaii, Marshall or App State. Can/will any individual conferences or schools ban NIL deals? Or would this violate the court ruling?
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Jul 18, 2021 21:37:23 GMT -5
It will be interesting to see how Notre Dame approaches this new world.i can only imagine what U Texas will do--think about the pressure on the football program from its wealthy boosters They don't really have a choice. Train is leaving the station, whether the Irish get onboard or not.
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 18, 2021 21:39:12 GMT -5
Some states adopted the policy as law before the NCAA relented. My guess is that schools in those states could not ban it. Others ?
|
|
|
Post by hc6774 on Jul 19, 2021 7:11:26 GMT -5
Tax questions for the individual student/athlete ?
SCOTUS' ruling on NCAA's definition of allowable 'educational expenses' - no?
Changes in NIL state laws & new NCAA policy - yes?
|
|
|
Post by newfieguy74 on Jul 19, 2021 7:17:25 GMT -5
While I was watching TV this weekend I saw a Puma commercial featuring Paige Bueckers. It was pretty well done but it was a little jarring to see a college sophomore in her own commercial. I imagine it was a good payday.
|
|
|
Post by hchoops on Jul 19, 2021 7:21:12 GMT -5
Was the commercial on a Connecticut station ?
|
|
|
Post by newfieguy74 on Jul 19, 2021 7:25:15 GMT -5
Was the commercial on a Connecticut station ? Yes. I live in central CT.
|
|
|
Post by Tom on Jul 19, 2021 8:16:58 GMT -5
$10,000 for a season of pre-game interviews on a fan site. And I thought that the ruling would be a way for boosters to channel cash to players
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 19, 2021 9:20:49 GMT -5
$10,000 for a season of pre-game interviews on a fan site. And I thought that the ruling would be a way for boosters to channel cash to players yes--count on it
|
|
|
Post by longsuffering on Jul 19, 2021 15:31:24 GMT -5
Now that it's legal I still won't be channeling any cash. I wonder if the other shoe will drop and the NCAA will allow Colleges to negotiate an offset of player earnings against their scholarship? For example a 50% offset would reduce the scholarship by $5K due to the $10K interview fee.
|
|
|
Post by nycrusader2010 on Jul 19, 2021 18:38:40 GMT -5
Now that it's legal I still won't be channeling any cash. I wonder if the other shoe will drop and the NCAA will allow Colleges to negotiate an offset of player earnings against their scholarship? For example a 50% offset would reduce the scholarship by $5K due to the $10K interview fee. Definitely won't happen. The two things are financially unrelated. And if any major school did that, plenty of rivals would be there to swoop in and offer the kid a full ride in addition to NIL carte blanche.
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 19, 2021 20:49:38 GMT -5
The competition has begun. The power5 schools, and their boosters, will be investing a new fortune on buying players
|
|
|
Post by cmo on Jul 19, 2021 21:07:09 GMT -5
Let’s get a crossports gofundme for a 6’12 center and a gunslinger QB
|
|
|
Post by HCFC45 on Jul 21, 2021 7:23:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by newfieguy74 on Jul 21, 2021 8:50:07 GMT -5
The change in the NIL rule wasn't surprising but I think there will be some ugly consequences. I wonder, though, whether it might stem the tide of one and dones in college basketball. Why not stay at, for example, Duke, if you can make a million dollars or so a year with NIL money?
|
|
|
Post by inhocsigno on Jul 21, 2021 9:34:23 GMT -5
Which Crusader gets that NIL money for endorsing Herbie's? McGuire's?
|
|
|
Post by longsuffering on Jul 21, 2021 9:46:40 GMT -5
What if a Crusader became a paid NRA spokesperson? Would HC have to grin and bear it?
|
|
|
Post by KY Crusader 75 on Jul 21, 2021 10:41:13 GMT -5
Good point--we wouldn't want our players to support the US Constitution
|
|
|
Post by newfieguy74 on Jul 21, 2021 11:43:15 GMT -5
Good point--we wouldn't want our players to support the US Constitution One could argue that supporting the NRA and supporting the 2d Amendment are two different things. There are many responsible NRA members but some of its leadership have refused to consider any safety measures/gun regulation in any way, shape, or form.
|
|
|
Post by rgs318 on Jul 21, 2021 12:03:13 GMT -5
You make a valid distinction between the NRA and the second amendment.
|
|